# Discussion surrounding reviewer incentives, sales, and other issues **URL:** \ **Category:** Miscellaneous\ **Created:** [June 2, 2022, 2:10am UTC](https://forum.headphones.com/t/discussion-surrounding-reviewer-incentives-sales-and-other-issues/17935 "2022-06-02T02:10:25Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![Reed](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/9de0a6/32.png) [@Reed](https://forum.headphones.com/u/Reed)\ **Post date:** [May 30, 2022, 8:14pm UTC](https://forum.headphones.com/t/discussion-surrounding-reviewer-incentives-sales-and-other-issues/17935/2 "2022-05-30T20:14:33Z")
Indeed, I did hear that too. I also, I noticed that he haven’t been able to get a VC to review as well. Maybe zach doesn’t want his gear measured (like the abyss guys) ? And in a way I understand it. a lot zmf attraction comes from the art-like marketing strategy, where the cups are from precious wood and in limited availability, so people feel privileged to own one. And you are garanteed to have a unique hand made piece. If @Resolve starts to getting analytical, and reduce the “piece-of-art” to it’s sound capabilities only, then its main selling point is no longer a criteria, and they lay loose that attraction. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.headphones.com/t/discussion-surrounding-reviewer-incentives-sales-and-other-issues/17935)._