# Shure - Official Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.headphones.com/t/shure-official-thread/5976>\
**Category:** Headphones\
**Created:** [April 2, 2020, 10:28pm UTC](https://forum.headphones.com/t/shure-official-thread/5976 "2020-04-02T22:28:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![frkasper](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.headphones.com/frkasper/32/9408_2.png) [@frkasper](https://forum.headphones.com/u/frkasper)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2022, 10:04pm UTC](https://forum.headphones.com/t/shure-official-thread/5976/21 "2022-02-06T22:04:01Z")

</div>

Watched this recording today. Quite neat all arounder presentation:

[![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/uploads/headphones/original/3X/9/7/97dd7d99f4d0694d0255f324c06f853f6d358833.jpeg "Webinar: Understanding Earphone Technology | Shure") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJeSm0zep00)

Here’s a screenshot at 33’58":

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/uploads/headphones/original/3X/4/f/4f1d17c5a95a7bc9f9287cfb73b8bb67a5b41403.jpeg)

It looks like Shure baked its own methodology on assessing the transients. Here’s a follow-up [question](https://service.shure.com/s/article/kse1500-and-se846-correlation-to-original-input-signal?language=en_US) from one attendee in the webinar.

My point is. There’s still a lot of room for developing new testing methodologies and looks like Shure baked their own.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thunder240](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.headphones.com/thunder240/32/15083_2.png) [@Thunder240](https://forum.headphones.com/u/Thunder240)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2022, 4:16am UTC](https://forum.headphones.com/t/shure-official-thread/5976/22 "2022-02-10T04:16:38Z")

</div>

7 months later, I can answer the question I posed regarding ZMF pads.

It took a bit of work, but I put an used set of ZMF Ori lambskin perforated pads on my 1840s. The fit isn’t perfect — the plastic guide on the cups that fit inside the pad’s leather flap is a bit too elongated given the near circular shape of the Ori, but there is enough extra material that I didn’t have to stretch it, and they stay on fine albeit a bit loose in the front and back.

Sound wise, the mid bass bump that the Ori is known for comes through, and it is a welcome addition IMO. As for the overall effect of the pad, i need to listen for longer to form a clear judgement, especially jazz and classical, paying attention to the treble and upper mids. I’ll follow up in a few days.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thunder240](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.headphones.com/thunder240/32/15083_2.png) [@Thunder240](https://forum.headphones.com/u/Thunder240)\
**Post date:** [June 18, 2023, 9:57pm UTC](https://forum.headphones.com/t/shure-official-thread/5976/23 "2023-06-18T21:57:04Z")

</div>

I just realized I left this hanging.

Eventually I removed the ZMF Ori perf pads and went back to stock. I decided it didn’t sound natural, which was what originally drew me to the 1840 in the first place. Before removing them I tried diying some attenuator rings out of card stock, but that didn’t improve things.

So, the pad fits, but not my cup of tea.

[Previous page](https://forum.headphones.com/t/shure-official-thread/5976.md?page=1)
