# ZMF Vérité C - Closed-Back Dynamic Headphone - Official Thread

**URL:** <https://forum.headphones.com/t/zmf-verite-c-closed-back-dynamic-headphone-official-thread/3702>\
**Category:** Official Headphone Model Discussion\
**Tags:** zmf, closed, dynamic, high-end\
**Created:** [August 23, 2019, 4:06pm UTC](https://forum.headphones.com/t/zmf-verite-c-closed-back-dynamic-headphone-official-thread/3702 "2019-08-23T16:06:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 30

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Torq](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.headphones.com/torq/32/16384_2.png) [@Torq](https://forum.headphones.com/u/Torq)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2019, 9:25pm UTC](https://forum.headphones.com/t/zmf-verite-c-closed-back-dynamic-headphone-official-thread/3702/30 "2019-08-27T21:25:17Z")

</div>

Since these cans have had a chance to run-in bit now (just over 100 hours total at this point), and I’m not hearing any changes at this point, I wanted to re-run my frequency response measurements, as well as compare them to my open-back Vérité.

So, first I’ve updated the first post with the new measurements (original ones are still there for comparison. And second, here’s how the Vérité C (in Monkeypod) stack up against the original Vérité (in Ziricote), with the same pads on both (Universe, Lambskin, Unperforated), with alignments at 300 Hz and 1 kHz, for HEQ and CUST compensations:

 ![Verite%20vs%20Verite%20C%20-%20Universe%20Lambskin%20Unperforated%20-%20HEQ%20-%2084%20dB%20at%20300%20Hz](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/uploads/headphones/original/2X/2/2eda5076ec6b9a6112042dced44341b39dab79dd.png)

 ![Verite%20vs%20Verite%20C%20-%20Universe%20Lambskin%20Unperforated%20-%20CUST%20-%2084%20dB%20at%20300%20Hz](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/uploads/headphones/original/2X/2/2073a2242e5f81e48a1f11d01cb04fc537ecb3ff.png)

 ![Verite%20vs%20Verite%20C%20-%20Universe%20Lambskin%20Unperforated%20-%20HEQ%20-%2084%20dB%20at%201%20kHz](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/uploads/headphones/original/2X/0/0c745fabea3510af544d0af70bf9d5a5711dca58.png)

 ![Verite%20vs%20Verite%20C%20-%20Universe%20Lambskin%20Unperforated%20-%20CUST%20-%2084%20dB%20at%201%20kHz](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/uploads/headphones/original/2X/8/824ca5752d94362eac894f009fae5277f706fbaa.png)

I’ve got measurements with all variants of the Universe pads (Lambskin and Suede, Perf and Un-Perf), Eikon (Lambskin, Un-Perf), Auteur (Lambskin, Un-Perf) and Vérité (Lambskin, Perf) - which I’ll get posted when I get a chance.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.headphones.com/t/zmf-verite-c-closed-back-dynamic-headphone-official-thread/3702)._