IEMs Discovery & General Discussion

I was contacted by John Creigan from Jackrabbit Media and invited to review the Westone MACH 60 IEM.

Westone is a brand best known for its IEMs designed for stage musicians. Currently its inventory includes the AM Pro X, Pro X and MACH ranges.

The MACH range itself has two categories, Premium Reference, which includes the MACH 20, 40, 60 and 80 and Premium Bass, comprising the MACH 10, 30, 50 and 70. The Premium Reference series tuning is designed to be neutral whereas the Premium Bass line has a warmer tonality.

The MACH 60 featured here is the second highest model in the Premium Reference series, equipped with six balanced armature drivers per channel, two each for the bass, midrange and treble. A three-way passive crossover divides the signal amongst the six drivers. A frequency response of 8Hz-20kHz is specified along with an impedance of 35Ω and a sensitivity of 100dB @ 1kHz. The MACH 60 retails for £1099.

The Packaging
The MACH 60 comes in a large rectangular box with a full-colour sleeve featuring a montage including an image of the IEMs and the model name MACH 60 displayed in a modern sans serif font. The rear of the box shows the specifications and a list of the contents. Removing the sleeve reveals a black box bearing the Westone Audio logo and the legend “Inspired by Lucid Hearing”. Within you will find a large black pelican case inside which you will find:

● Westone MACH 60 IEMs
● Estron Linum SuperBaX T2 cable
● 5 pairs of foam tips
● 5 pairs of silicone tips
● Carabiner
● Soft protective bag
● Velcro cable tie
● Cleaning tool
● Card with QR link to manual

Design and Build
The MACH 60 IEMs have a shell made from a durable plastic material in black and grey. The faceplate is metal with the right side featuring the Westone logo and the left bearing the model name MACH 60. The gold-plated T2 cable socket has a pronounced forward rake and the earpieces are lightweight and comfortable.

The Linum SuperBaX cable has a 4-core construction with 168 strands of silver-plated copper and has a braided black covering. The T2 termination and right-angled 3.5mm plug are gold-plated and the two-part Y-split detaches to provide a chin slider. The cable is approximately 1.2m in length and is very light with a weight of 9g and has a low impedance of 0.75 ohms. Bearing in mind the price level of these IEMs, I was disappointed that a modular cable was not included, which would have facilitated balanced operation.

Fit and Isolation
Once the MACH 60 was placed perfectly horizontally, it fitted snugly inside my ear. The long nozzles and extended eartips produced a deep insertion which was very comfortable and after a short time it was easy to forget that the IEMs were there. I experimented with the supplied tips and obtained the best result with the largest silicone type with an orange bore. Thus fitted, a healthy bass response was obtained with superb isolation. Westone’s long thin nozzles did not allow me to try standard IEM tips so “tip rolling” was not possible.

The MACH 60 was tested with a variety of sources: three different DAPs, a digital radio and a smartphone via a USB-C dongle DAC. A “burn-in” of 100 hours was performed to run in the components and the sound continued to improve throughout the burn-in period. Sensitivity was a little low, with a higher volume level necessary compared to the MACH 70. After a lengthy evaluation, I settled on the Xduoo X20, which provided more power and gave the most pleasing results, as the primary source.

Sound Impressions
Tonality
The MACH 60 immediately impressed with a well-balanced and neutral profile and good extension at both ends of the spectrum. Detail was copious with an attractive delicacy in the high frequencies and the soundstage was expansive with impressive stereo imaging. There was a solid impactful bass, open and expressive midrange and an airy smooth treble. The tonality throughout was very good with no evidence of “BA timbre”. In fact the MACH 60 shared the same Westone house sound with a similar character to that of the MACH 70, AM Pro x10 and AM Pro X30. The overall impression was of accuracy and refinement, commensurate with a high quality in-ear monitor.

Bass
The MACH 60’s bass was clean, detailed and fast, as expected from a balanced armature driver, whilst displaying a very natural timbre and accurate reproduction of decay and texture. The bass profile was largely neutral or “reference” style with good extension, but more or less on the same level as the midrange. Compared to the popular Harman curve, sub bass was somewhat rolled off but mid bass displayed good energy and impact and it did not bleed into the lower midrange. Orchestral basses and cellos displayed a natural warmth and accurate timbre with rich harmonic expression.

Aaron Copland’s popular “Fanfare for the Common Man” is a tour de force for brass and percussion. It has been recorded many times but the performance by the Minnesota Orchestra under Eiji Oue is perhaps one of the finest. This remarkable recording came to life in dramatic fashion on the MACH 60 with the initial strike and rebound of the bass drum’s skin beautifully rendered. The timpani displayed superb speed and impact, forming a perfect backdrop for the sparkling brass melody.

“Desseins Eternels” is the third movement of “La Nativite” by Olivier Messaien. It is a gentle, meditative and slow-paced piece exploring chordal harmonies. It features a somewhat meandering theme underpinned by deep pedal progressions. In the version performed by Louis Thiry at the organ of Geneva Cathedral, there was good texture and resolution from the MACH 60 but the very lowest notes were more distant sounding than ideal, though possessing an accurate timbre. This neutral bass tuning resulted in just a slight lack of “body” softening the impact of the piece and lessening its “gravitas”.

Kevin Kendle is a British electronic music artist with over 30 albums to his name. “Silent Trees” is a beautiful soundscape from his album “Winter”. A gently descending melody underpinned by a solid bass line gradually becomes more prominent with a more complex accompaniment. Brian Abbott’s guitar accents add interest and in the climax of the piece a deep sub bass foundation evokes a sense of foreboding. The MACH 60 handled this very well with a palpable sense of power and texture although a little more weight would have been welcome.

Midrange
With its reference-style tuning, the MACH 60’s midrange was clean, transparent and detailed with good detail. There was no evidence of recession and the tonality was consistent throughout the range. There was no warming influence from the bass and pinna gain was gentle with no excessive brightness towards the treble boundary. Voices were nicely projected above the accompaniment with male vocals possessing good weight and female vocals open and clear. Woodwind and brass instruments came over crisp and airy in character while strings possessed a realistic bite and resonance.

“Winter Light” is the theme song from the film “The Secret Garden”. Linda Ronstadt performs it wonderfully with an ethereal vocal delivery. The MACH 60 made the most of this with a detailed rendition marked by clarity and precision, full of atmosphere and emotion. Zbigniew Preisner’s beautiful orchestration sounded lush and spacious, forming a perfect backdrop for Linda Ronstadt’s beautiful vocal performance.

The Adagio fom Schubert’s String Quintet is a classic piece with a notably concentrated quality. In the version by the Melos Quartet with Mstislav Rostropovich, the MACH 60 brought the piece to life in dramatic fashion with the various instruments sounding natural and vibrant, and the atmosphere of the recording venue a joy to hear. The contrast of bowed and plucked strings was realised authentically with a perfect balance between the players and a fine
reproduction of the ambience of the hall. Violins and violas displayed a natural tonality and the pizzicato notes of the cello were nicely portrayed in a spacious manner with a real sense of “being there”. The balance of the various instruments was well judged.

The Piano Guys presented an enchanting version of “Bring him Home” from “Les Miserables”. Performed on cello with piano accompaniment, the listener was drawn in by the atmosphere and simplicity of the presentation. The MACH 60 delivered a warm and emotional performance with a perfect balance between the two instruments. With a believable timbre, the cello and piano came over as natural and authentic and in the central section, the rich tonality of the lower notes of the piano was particularly enjoyable.

Treble
With a detailed and accurate delivery and deceptively fine extension, the MACH 60’s treble was one of its best features. The speedy transient attack ensured that leading edges were reproduced with precision and verve producing a sound redolent of a live performance. The inherent smoothness ensured that there was no listening fatigue while still revealing abundant detail and air.

The MACH 60 produced a clean and crisp string timbre in Rossini’s “String Sonata No.1”. The natural harmonics defining the various instruments were accurately conveyed in the excellent recording by The Age of Enlightenment Orchestra. Each instrument displayed real character and the excellent transient attack with incisive and clean leading edges endowed the whole performance with a “live” quality. The details of bowing and pizzicato were authentic and micro-detail was also effective here with the subtle and delicate effects in the counterpoint easy to discern.

Vaughan Williams’s “The Lark Ascending” is a much-recorded work. Sarah Chang’s performance with the LPO conducted by Bernard Haitink is unusually vivid and dynamic and there was an attractive immediacy casting a different light on the work which is often portrayed in a more languid fashion. Once again, the MACH 60’s ability to reproduce harmonics accurately came to the fore with Sarah Chang presenting the work in a very direct and emotional way and the MACH 60 made the most of it with a most believable rendition of the soaring solo instrument set against a perfectly balanced orchestral accompaniment. The final few notes as the violin portrayed the ascent of the bird into the sky were communicated in a most sensitive and delicate manner.

“Vapor Drawings” is an album by Mark Isham combining new age, electronic and jazz elements. The opening track, “Many Chinas” begins with intricate electronic effects in the extreme left and right of the stage. The MACH 60 reproduced these with precise detail. Following this, a trumpet theme is introduced, supported by punchy bass lines and keyboard embellishments. The whole piece came together really well with excellent clarity within an expansive and airy soundstage while the MACH 60’s incisive transient response ensured that the rhythmic integrity of the piece was faithfully communicated.

Soundstage and Imaging
The MACH 60 produced a large stage with a good representation of width and height. Due to the forward nature of the midrange, I found there was a slight lack of depth which affected layering and the perception of the position of instruments within an orchestra. Recordings of smaller ensembles did not suffer from this effect but this was still only a minor issue. Separation was very well reproduced and movement within the stereo image convincingly handled.

“First Flight” by Alasdair Fraser appears on the Narada compilation album " A Childhood Remembered". It features solo violin supported by synthesisers supported by a whole range of acoustic instruments and percussion. On the MACH 60, the rhythmic lead melody stood out clearly against the colourful and complex accompaniment and deep synth bass with a palpable sense of space, producing a feeling of being wrapped in sound. Each of the disparate elements in the recording occupied their own space and were easy to locate within the overall picture.

In Anatoly Liadov’s beautiful “The Enchanted Lake”, bass trombones and tuba in the background created a menacing atmosphere overlaid by delicate strings and clear brass parts with the horns placed wide in the left of the stage and harp figurations adding to the drama. Later in the piece the woodwind arpeggios accompanied by brass chords produced a most pleasing effect. The dynamic shifts in the performance by the Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra of London under Charles Gerhardt were very realistically portrayed by the MACH 60 with only a little more depth in the staging required to make it perfect.

“On Air” from 1996, is the second solo album after the Alan Parsons Project split up and is inspired by the history of airborne exploration. The Alan Parsons Project’s series of progressive music albums feature a wide range of musical styles, all beautifully recorded and produced. “On Air” is in a similar vein. The opening track is a shortened version of the last track on the album. “Blue Blue Sky” begins with birdsong in the open air. The MACH 60 presented this very naturally with a real sense of space and a close miked vocal by Eric Stewart follows, with an exceptionally clear acoustic guitar accompaniment. After the final bars of the song, two jet aircraft speed across the image from right to left and the effect was very convincing and exciting with a realistic “airy” feel as the sound faded and reverberated in the air with a very natural decay.

Comparisons
Westone MACH 70
The MACH 70 is equipped with one BA for the bass, two BAs for the midrange and has four treble drivers. The packaging, contents and earpieces are identical to those of the MACH 60 apart from the cable which is the Linum Estron UltraBaX.
A frequency response of 5Hz-22kHz is specified with an impedance of 42Ω and a sensitivity of 110dB @ 1mW.

The MACH 70 sounds warmer than the '60, with a deeper sub bass, more prominent mid bass, a slightly recessed midrange and a smoother treble. The staging is very similar but it has more depth due to the moderate recession in the midrange referred to earlier. A major difference is in power requirements with the '70 needing far less power to sound at its best. Fit and comfort are identical to the '60, being the most comfortable IEMs I have tried and enabling the listener to enjoy music for long periods without fatigue. In a sense, the '60 and '70 are complementary with very different tunings, but both are very enjoyable with their different characteristics and applications. The neutrally-tuned '60 is more suitable for monitoring and has a better reproduction of detail whereas the '70 is aimed more towards musicality.

Westone AM Pro X30
The AM Pro X30 is the highest model in the Pro X series, equipped with three balanced armature drivers per channel, one each for the bass, midrange and treble. A three-way passive crossover divides the signal amongst the three drivers. A frequency response of 20Hz-18kHz is specified along with an impedance of 56Ω and a sensitivity of 124dB @ 1mW.

The MACH 60 and X30 do sound very similar in their tuning, which is designed to be neutral, focusing on accuracy with excellent technicalities. The major difference derives from the “passive ambience” feature in the X30 which allows some external sounds to be heard. The '60’s isolation is nigh-on perfect and this affects the staging. The X30’s stage is more expansive than the MACH 60 and comes across with more depth. This I believe, can be imputed to the fact that the passive ambience feature acts like a vented earpiece simulating the staging of a full-sized headphone. In most other respects the two are equal in ability except for the bass which is more extended on the MACH 60. The X30 does give the impression of being truly neutral whereas there is a touch more warmth in the MACH 60’s presentation.

Conclusion
Westone’s MACH series of balanced armature IEMs features eight models, all of which have individual tunings. The MACH 60’s tonality is designed to be accurate and neutral/warm with an expressive midrange. It succeeds in this respect with a near flawless performance, only wanting that last octave of sub-bass and a little more depth in the staging to be perfect. It is supremely comfortable, does not induce any listening fatigue and, like its stablemate the MACH 70, has a very natural timbre.

Sitting near the top of the MACH range, the MACH 60 is a considered purchase. It is not for “bassheads” or those who enjoy a V-shaped or Harman-type profile. However, if you value accuracy and technical prowess without abandoning musical satisfaction, then it comes highly recommended.






2 Likes

Well, this is certainly interesting. I see how this could really be the last IEM you would ever need. IF it lives up to its promise… :thinking: Hoping someone brings this to CanJam NYC in a few months, I am most definitely intrigued. (*Hint: Penon seems to have no US distributors?)

PENON RIVAL (penonaudio.com)

I just discovered this brand, Nostalgia Audio Camelot.
It seems that they are more of a luxury audio-oriented brand based out of Singapore, the tuning seems so inoffensive and coherent with excellent vocals. I am running it with the Lancelot Cable which is increasing the details retrieval of this IEM & IDK how the texturing is also improved. Again the treble is not extended but it feels premium through and through. The total cost of this set is around $3776

Letshuoer S12 2024 Edition


TLDR version on YouTube: TDLR - Letshuoer S12 2024 Edition

The Letshuoer S12 2024 edition have been sent to me directly by Letshuoer for me to try them out and share my opinions in this review. Letshuoer have not made any requests or comments and, as always, I will do my best to be as unbiased as humanly possible.

The Letshuoer S12 2024 official page is here: Letshuoer S12 2024 Edition 14.8mm Planar Magnetic Driver in Ear Monito – letshuoer

As with all links I post, this is a non-affiliate link.

To avoid being repetitive in my reviews, you can find all the info about how I create the reviews, equipment used, how I receive the products and how to interpret my reviews by visiting: About my reviews


Intro…

Jumping back to April 2022, when the first real planar IEM boom started, I got to try out the Letshuoer S12, a set that immediately turned into my main daily driver. In fact, I remember that the title of the video review in Spanish was “my new EDC”. They continued to be one of my most used sets for a long time and only really lost their spot in my box of 6 quick grab IEMs quite recently. So, it goes without saying that I was (am) a fan of the original S12.

Fast forward to a few months ago and Letshuoer reached out to me to let me know that, as part of their 8 year anniversary, they would be releasing a 2024 Edition of the S12, limited to 2,024 units. I was, of course, very happy to agree to reviewing them and looked forwards to giving them a listen.

Now, these aren’t the first variation of the S12, we also got the S12 Pro and the Z12 which, funnily enough, I never got to listen to but I do know that they received a lot of praise.

So, what is special about the 2024 edition?

We’ll get to details in a moment but apart from the limited number, the Letshuoer focuses mainly on the special accessories that are included, along with the limited edition shell colour. They don’t actually say much about changes in tuning or sound, although there are (something that we will also get to in just a moment).

The 2024 edition comes in at $199 while the original S12 is available for $90 less on Letshuoers site, so what do we get that is special?


Presentation…

I have to say that before I even opened the outer box, I was already intrigued by the presentation. The outer brown shipping box features the Letshuoer branding, something that is not very common on shipping boxes (at least those that I receive) and opening it reveals a black interior with more branding and a gold coloured box inside a large bubble wrap sealed envelope. As I said, we haven’t even got to the main box yet and I already felt that these were something different.

Removing the gold inner box from the bubble wrap, this shows an “8th” design in a raised texture, with “Letshuoer 8th Anniversary” in black at the top and “S12 Limited Edition” at the bottom. On the back we just get some basic specifications etc.

Opening the gold box we find another box, this time a rigid black box with a lift off lid that reveals a gold (coloured) commemorative medallion style item sitting in a white cardboard inlay which refers to the Letshuoer 8th Anniversary. At first I thought this was the keychain that Letshuoer refer to on their web but there is another one in the box, so I am not really sure what it is. This medallion/keychain has a spinning centre and while I wouldn’t actually put it on my keys (I like to keep them small and manageable), it has become a bit of a fidget toy on my desk.

Under the top layer we find the fourth box, inside of which we get the user manual, 9 sets of tips in 3 types (vocal, balanced and memory foam) on a card, the warranty card and a commemorative card in black and gold.

Underneath this we finally come across the gold coloured IEMs sitting inside foam cutouts, the storage/transport case containing the cable, and a final (fifth) box that contains a more manageable keychain, if the first one was actually a keychain. Or maybe they go together?

Either way, there is no reason that I can fault the packaging and contents of the S12 2024 edition. It is true that we don’t need all the boxes and goodies but this is a “special edition” and the unboxing does make it feel like it is.


Build and aesthetics…

The IEMs are, as far as I can tell, identical to the original S12 except that the outer plate is gold coloured and the inner shell is black. To be honest, I thought that the black part of the shell was plastic or resin but Letshuoer mention says that the entire body utilizes a titanium alloy chamber with a high precision CNC milled shell, so I guess they are all metal, as were the originals.

I found the originals to be very comfortable and the 2024 edition is no different. They are small enough to fit comfortably in my ears and light enough to not cause any fatigue. As far as aesthetics, I am not someone who favours gold but I understand that they are a limited edition and they are also on the rose gold / copper side of the spectrum, so they are not as “blingy” as they could be.

The included cable is titanium coloured with gold hardware that matched the IEMs. I can’t say it is my favourite cable ever but it is a nice cable nonetheless. It also features interchangeable connectors, with 2.5, 3.5 and 4.4mm being included.

The storage / travel case is the usual Letshuoer round, screw top, kind. This is not something that I chose for transporting IEMs in my pocket but it is great for storing IEMs when not in use.

In general, I have no complaints with the build or aesthetics. They chose a colour theme for the anniversary edition and have maintained it throughout, making it something that does portray itself as a special edition, especially when the unboxing experience also matched the colour scheme.


Sound…

All tracks mentioned are clickable links that allow you to open the reference track in the streaming service of your choice (YouTube, Tidal, Qobuz, Spotify, etc.)

As I said in the intro, Letshuoer so not say anything about changes in sound between the original and the 2024 version, yet there are some.

Before explaining how this version sounds, here is the graph comparing the two, along with my usual preference curve for reference:


As soon as I started listening to the s12 2024, it was like putting on an old pair of shoes. Yes, you may have newer and more extravagant shoes, but there is something about those old comfortable shoes that just feels correct. During my initial listening sessions, which are while I am focusing on work and not music, I honestly didn’t really pick up on the differences.

However, as time went on and I listened to more familiar tracks, I started to notice that things seemed a little more “powerful” than on the original. By that I don’t mean that they were louder, or that they were bassier (although I will mention a little more on that in a second), just that they seemed to have more “authority” to them, especially in things like kick drums.

This sensation was more apparent when listening to the originals again, especially when moving on to my detailed listening sessions with my test tracks.

Chameleon” is clean yet powerful in its subbass, with midbass that adds to the sensation rather than detracting from it. Although the original S12 is also clean and controlled with this track, again, I feel that the 2024 seems to do it with more authority.

No Sanctuary Here” gives the same sensation, not that there is more bass than on the original, but that the bass has more “thump” to it, without an increase in the midbass range. Again, clarity is good. In my review of the original S12, I mentioned that the slight additional presence of midbass (over my personal preferences) worked well for things like “Whole Lotta Love”, giving a little bit more body to the bass guitar on older rock recordings. With the 2024 I don’t get that sensation. There is no lack of midbass but it doesn’t quite give that same sensation of warmth that the original did in this case, it seems more clear. Not saying that is sounds bad, far from it, just a little different from what I came to expect from the original.

Moving through the mids, I find that the response hear deviates very little from the original, staying nicely balanced with good presence to the lower ranges of vocals and instruments that sound clean, such as the bass guitar in “Elephants On Ice Skates” that is once again nicely balanced between the slaps, plucks and lower notes.

Moving into the upper mids and lower treble is where I find the most noticeable difference between the two sets. Vocals still have a nice presence to them and that slight hint of harshness and sibilance in “Diamonds On The Soles Of Her Shoes” is still present when volume is pushed (above my usual listening levels), but overall I find things to be a little smoother.

As far as the “Code Cool” sibilance test, Patricia Barber still presents some sibilance on this set, as she did on the originals, placing her around a +1 or +2 on my non-scientific scale. This is reduced quite a bit by swapping tips, making her more neutral in this range, but once again, the sibilance level is very reminiscent of the originals.

As far as detail and separation, it may just be my brain and the placebo effect, but I do feel that the newer model is an improvement. Listening to “Strange Fruit” on both sets, I feel that there is a bit more space between the vocal layers and that details are pushed slightly further forwards. This is not necessarily an increase in detail per se, more of them being more in focus.

Soundstage is something that I find very pleasurable on the S12 2024, with a nice sensation of space and location in things like “La Luna”. They may not be the most spacious sounding IEMs but there is still plenty of stage for things to be located all around you.


Conclusion…

I have tried to refer to many of the tracks that I referred to in my review of the original S12 (which you can find here), giving a reference point as to how this stacks up against the original.

There is no doubt that the S12 2024 is a very nicely presented set that does make you feel like you are getting something special when you receive it, which is good seeing that it is a special limited edition.

There is nothing to complain about as far as build and I am probably not the best one to comment on aesthetics, seeing that I am not really a fan of gold.

So that leaves the sound and the performance of the IEMs, which, at the end of the day, is the important thing when buying a set of earphones. It is no secret that I am a fan of the S12 and, in my personal opinion, the S12 2024 is slightly better. It is not a night and day thing, it is small things that stand out to me when listening to music, but I would personally say that I would choose the 2024 edition over the original based on musical enjoyment. They just seem to present things in a more impressive way while still keeping the strong points of the original.

Is this worth the $90 price difference? Based solely on the musical reproduction, I would say no. However, you are not just getting the musical reproduction, you are getting the things that go with a limited edition and that is something you need to consider.


As with all my reviews, this can also be found in Spanish, both on my blog (www.achoreviews.com) and on YouTube (www.youtube.com/@achoreviews)

All FR measurements of IEMs can be viewed and compared on achoreviews.squig.link

All isolation measurements of IEMs can be found on achoreviews.squig.link/isolation

3 Likes

My Sundara ear muffs are falling apart, and I have been looking at replacements or a new setup. I’ve been hearing a lot about IEM and wondering if there are options that are better than Sundara for music and competitive pc gaming.

Is there an IEM which doesn’t have high mids and treble that sound like rubbing two pieces of styrofoam together??

I’m at my wits end.
The Kato has that hashy thin sound up top.
The Alba is better but still not quite there.

What gives? Over ear headphones aren’t like this at all.

How’s the Dunu DaVinci ? And I’ll get rid of the Kato and Alba?

Read My Full Review Here - Eminent Ears Ruby Review

Eminent Ears Ruby -
Finally something BOLD and DIFFERENT

Pros:

  1. The approach toward a fun sound is done well in this IEM
  2. The overall tuning while being very fun is not snatching away any fundamental sense of naturalness
  3. The authority in both extremes of the spectrum is commendable
  4. The Technicalities are well-implemented
  5. Exceptional Aesthetics and Packaging

Cons:

  1. The cost you are required to pay is undoubtedly a premium
  2. Not well accessorised for the price
  3. Somewhat hard to drive
  4. The treble might use some refinement while maintaining the elevation
  5. Not all genres will sound good ( Like - Hindustani Classical & Vocal Centric Songs )

( Not A ) General Chi-Fi Feeling

There are a lot of companies of Chinese origin that captured the market like Alexander. And Chifi comes with its pros and cons. On one hand, some companies come with extreme affordability, but balance is lost in them somehow, and a few of the companies suffer from QC and cheap equipment. This doesn’t feel like one of those species. The overall aspect from unboxing to aesthetics felt very polished and intricate.

Eminent – Ears is based out of Hong Kong, China too. When one of my friends went to Can-Jam, he noticed this IEM - Ruby and brought it back to India. Thanks to Pulkit from Gadget Generation (YouTube). For introducing me to this IEM.

At first glance, Ruby seemed like it was carved from a vertically shattered gemstone. And oh! God, it looks stunning. When the light reflects from its faceplates, it just screams beauty.

What I think about Expensive IEMs
What is the purpose of an Expensive IEM? On the one hand, this amount can be easily spent to get something truly endgame even in headphones. So why would anyone pay this money on an IEM? Is it worth the price? Is it justified to spend this much on an IEM? There are already a lot of people out there who would happily pay this much money for a headphone but not for an IEM. One thing is for sure: when you spend anything above $1500, no compromises can be tolerated.
And IEMs like this never existed a few years ago. The improvement IEMs got in the recent years in pure sound quality, is nothing sort of exemplary. But still, is it wise to spend so much money on an IEM?

Specifications

This IEM consists of 1DD + 4BA + 4EST

The configuration makes this IEM very demanding compared to something like Camelot. And yes, without an ample amount of power, it will lack the bass and dynamics.

Ruby is 103dB in loudness and 60 ohms in impedance.

To give you a reference, Ruby is not well suited for DX180 at high gain. I had to use Rose Technics RT5000 and JDS ATOM to bring it to its true potential. So, this might give you a hint about the power requirement of this IEM. The sub-bass gets very alive with the power, as well as the treble becomes a lot smoother.

(You can see different shades of red because of the different angle of light refraction)

Design

The shell is big, but it is too light for its size. So even though it was too big for my ears, it didn’t hurt me a bit. Although it was not inserted into my ears fully, as it was sticking out quite a bit, I can wear it for 3-4 hours without a problem.

These shells on the other hand look so good. Not up to my ally but for someone who loves flashy designs this one might take the crown for it. Previously I was this impressed by the looks of an IEM when I was reviewing the Verdandi.

Cable Talk

The included cable which is made by Vortex is a nice touch and adds to the whole premium package. This IEM looks like an expensive IEM. Although I have a slight complaint about the cable, that when you touch close to the splitter, it causes micro-phonics.

Also, I did try the Lavania cable too which was also made by vortex, which made the Ruby smoother and fuller. But it costs a bit much so, I decided to review this IEM with stock cable. But nevertheless, if you are a cable guy, this thing will improve things for the better.

Included Package

The packaging of the IEM feels very premium but the case is not. Why would you include such a small case for such an IEM? Half of the time it takes more than 1 minute to arrange it securely in the case.

It also comes with two sets of tips, which felt very cheap. They were very generic ones. I get that when you invest in such an IEM, you won’t use it with stock tips like ever. So, it was not much of a problem with me.

So, I used the Divinus Velvet tips and got a bit of channel imbalance, not because of the IEM or the tips. However due to my left ear being a tiny bit larger than the right side. So when I switched to Stock Red Tips and then the Final E–Tips, the problem got solved.

It is very funny to realize how much length mode resonance can differ the sound quality of an IEM.

Coming to the elephant in the room, Ruby costs $2300 and I already discussed my thought process about expensive IEM in the Camelot Review, if you haven’t watched the review – do check.

Subjective Review

Sub-bass

Coming to the sound the sub-bass is the showstopper in this IEM. The amplitude is huge compared to even bass canons. Not just the amplitude the authority and physicality are immense in Ruby. The sub-bass is textured and detailed through and through. The room-filling effect that I like in my bass is there, although the room for vibrations is a bit small, but apart from that the bass is class-leading. If I must express the sub-bass in one word – it was rumbly unlike anything else. However, one nitpicking that I had was, that the attack was not that fast which would contribute to the bluntness of certain tracks (Electronic Mainly).

In the song – Hollow 16 Bit Remix – Take a listen

My brain felt like it was rattling. And my jaw was getting massaged. Although this kind of amplitude is available with a lot of power in hand.

Mid-bass

Coming to the mid-bass, it was not as authoritative as the sub-bass, but it does complement the sub-bass a lot. The mid-bass is elevated to a point that it doesn’t affect the lower midrange. The bass doesn’t make the vocals husky/grunt, what it does is cut off at a sweet spot where it doesn’t affect the vocals and keeps the mids very separated from the bass without sacrificing the coherency.

In the song, Personal: Emotional Oranges, Take a listen

The vocals stayed neutral and the bass showed its full potential. Again, it was not as huge as the sub-bass, but it retained all the quality of textures and the quality of the sub-bass. The attacks are somewhat analogue-like and not super speedy unnatural, as well as the decay and falloff, which helps immensely to provide the naturalness even after being V-shaped.

Lower Mid-range

For vocals as I said earlier, very neutral. A lot of details are there in the lower midrange, which is not pushed forward by the treble. The tuning feels natural and organic. No sweetness has been added like lushness, which I love in my music, so it is a kind of trade-off for me, but for most of the people out there it won’t be a problem since they would need Bass and Treble which will inherently make the midrange recessed. Although this range is greatly dependent on the recording, richer recordings will give you a very nice presentation.

In the song – No Sanctuary here, take a listen

Chris Jones sounds lush, thick and rich. And on the other hand, in the song Hey Jude, The Beatles sounded very neutral.

Upper Midrange

Coming to the upper mids, it is done in such a way that it will provide airiness without much sparkle. Unlike Camelot where the air was a bit missing, and the sparkly-ness was there. Although I love the Sparkly nature of IEMs on the other hand it is safely tuned in a phenomenal way. Nothing gets too contrasty and edging.

In the song Somewhere over the Rainbow, take a listen

Melissa sounded exceptional, but the sparklines were not there which gave it a vast feeling.

Treble

Treble on this IEM is not something that Eminent Ears can be proud of but, the treble on this IEM is very well managed. There are peaks that you will notice but the snappy nature of the treble is just pure joy. Even if there are 10 notes in front of you, this IEM will project each one of them with confidence and accuracy. This IEM is never tired of showing its speed, the quickest cues are captured with definition. However, I won’t recommend this IEM to a treble-sensitive person.

But to someone who loves treble, in amplitude. This IEM is a great match. Never it run it felt boring or unengaging.

In the song, The Way Up – Opening Part 1, take a listen

This song came out so spacious and fine-detailed that it never felt mushing up even a bit. Each cymbal hits felt full-bodied which has a distinctive start and end with a clear distinction. Containing all the crunch and snap it can get. The decay and attack are very impressive and fast.

IEMs under $300 are so good these days that it is scary for any brand to compete in this range. Tonality, technical ability, resolution everything got so much better in these two years that there might not be a point in investing in a more expensive IEM if all you want is a fundamentally good sound.

AFUL Performer 5+2 & Kiwi Ears KE4 -

These two IEMs especially found a good balance between being affordable and being mature in their tonality at the same time. But they do differ a lot even then.

Performer 7 is a braver approach to the sound. By the word brave, I mean it’s a riskier and bolder take on the tonality. Yet, P7 somehow smoothes out the harshness in the music whereas KE4 will give you the truest form of that representation. The upper half on KE4 reminds me of HD600 with a half-worn pad. Where P7 seems like a worthy upgrade to the P5.

The bass is more textured on the P7 with better body. But the physicality of KE4 is a touch better as well as it is more rounded. Resolution is better in P7, but tonality is better in KE4.

Mids are a bit forward on the P7, especially the lower mids. With a bit more texturing and details. But KE4 presents the mids in a very open fashion. The overall range feels like it is open and not on the face like P7 with a good amount of sense of space around the spherical stage and seems more holographic too. It creates such an odd position that half of my library sounds good on P7 (Vocal Centric) and others on KE4 (Instrument Centric).

In the treble KE4 is a total beast. It doesn’t have the same resolution as the P7 but the way it handles treble is extraordinary. It’s like neutral but given extra flavours here and there so that it doesn’t seem boring, even with my HRTF this thing just takes the cake for natural sound. P7 is a safer approach where the treble is smooth and reminiscent of AFUL house sound & not to mention the 10khz dip in my HRTF which makes the sound even smoother.

Although both IEMs are exceptionally good for their price and punch way above their price tag, it’s up to you to choose your flavour. Do you want an absolutely natural sound or a bit coloured?

1 Like

INTRODUCTION

This is my introduction to Kiwi Ears. I never used their products before, so I didn’t have any idea what to expect from them, so I approached the review of KE4 while having a black state in my mind. Saying so, I know KE4 is a hyped-up product in current scenario, and it dictates a tuning choice that is called “New Meta” which is the given name of IEMs that are tuned while keeping JM1-DF in mind.

What is JM1-DF? (The NEW META)

As we all know we hear sounds very differently, and so do Couplers. Recently B&K introduced their newest coupler 5128 on the market. Which is supposed to be a more accurate version of the Coupler IEC 711, still getting used largely in the community. There is a huge jump in the accuracy of the graphs in 5128. But due to some reason there are still some slight abnormalities that can be seen in the upper-mids / lower treble.

So JM1-DF is simply the corrected version of the 5128 Diffuse Field to give you a more natural sound (on an average ear).

[We all hear IEMs differently even if they produce the exact same sound (due to acoustic impedance and anatomy related to that). This is what we call HrTF (Head Related Transfer Function), which simply makes us distinguish spatial information generally and contributes to the individual liking of the headphones/earphones (Example – Some might find a headphone peaky, and some are not). So, to continue studies in audio we can’t rely on a single person or single direction (Remember, every direction represents a different curve), thus we use average of a sample. Which is called diffuse field (In other words, average of all directions). And We are talking about 5128’s diffuse field in the name JM1-DF].

UNBOXING

The KE4 comes in an average box. It’s neither too appealing nor too cheap to call it an issue. Apart from IEM and cable then comes with -

  • Case – The case is well thought out to hold the IEM. It fits perfectly with a dongle DAC. Small enough for every pocket, be it Jeans or trousers. It imprints Kiwi Ears Logo in the front and feels like cloth, made from rugged material which is one of the best-case materials. It houses a net to keep accessories in the case separated from the IEM.
  • Eartips – The ear tips are very average though. It feels extremely comfortably to my ears, but the seal was not that good, although I had zero problems would rate it above average for its comfort. The best thing it had is the earwax guard which I think is a much-needed practice to follow in the audio since people have dirty ears. But it does interfere with the sound a bit. Divinus Velvet is a somewhat better upgrade over the stock ear tips which gave me a bit of the detail boost as well as the more open upper registers.
  • Mesh Filters – I don’t think that they have moisture absorption capabilities, that you must confirm from somewhere else, but the added filters are a good touch to the overall package. I wish more companies would start to include filters along with the IEMs.

STOCK CABLE

Stock cable on the KE4 is average too. It is not too thick, which is a good thing for me. I only experienced tangle once in 10days. The splitter is extremely well built. Ear-hooks are flexible enough not to cause me even a bit of discomfort. Microphonics are not there in the cable. My set came with a 3.5mm termination and lastly, I have no complaint about the memory of the cable. The cable doesn’t look that appealing but does the job where I don’t have any problem.

FIT

The buds are on the medium side, and they properly fit my ears. The contour is not that aggressive, which helps in the fit too. The nozzle is a tiny bit larger than the average and on the same ballpark as the Hype series. Nozzle is not too long or short and provides a great seal with fitness. Although it is not comfortable while sleeping sideways.

DESIGN

The design of KE4 is very minimalist. Bland, simple and works. Personally, I am not a fan of the look of the IEM but who cares if it fits properly? Although I previously thought that the branding on the faceplate might look a bit ugly but in real life, it looks quite good. I wouldn’t have liked the blank faceplate even a bit. I love good looking IEMs and unfortunately this IEM didn’t pass the bar.

One thing about the design I liked a lot is the vent position. I ride bikes and IEMs come in handy while riding on long highways, which keeps me awake and aware. But due to the vent position I can get quite comfortable while riding the bike since I don’t have to worry about dirt/moisture getting into the IEM with wind.

POWER REQUIREMENTS

I have heard about KE4 being dependent on very high power but to my surprise it does sound good on all my devices. More power does give it a much-needed heft, but it does sound OK on low-powered devices. Let’s talk about the power requirements of the KE4,

Sources -

POCO X2 – Just does the fundamental tonality current. The dynamics felt missing, and the soundstage seemed on the face.

Moondrop Dawn Pro – The dynamics got restored, the bass got more confident and richer. The details and spatial effects got a huge booth.

JDS ATOM 2 - KE 4 sounded very full, and the resolution seemed the same as the Moondrop Dawn Pro. The heights seemed clearer and airy above 10Khz.

RoseTechnics RT5000 – The soundstage for a massive boost. It sounded like a $500 IEM; the only drawback was the detail retrieval and sense of positioning.

KAEI TAP1 – Extremely pleasing and organic sound. Beautiful tonality, OK tech but these two are made for each other.

SOUND

Coming to the single most deciding factor of the worthiness of an IEM for me, we will be discussing the Sound Quality of KE4 in two sections, Subjective (Which is personal to me and might not affect you unless you share same taste with me) and another one is Objective (Should be applicable to everyone). Before starting this section, I must declare that I am conducting this review after evaluating this IEM for more than 50 hours (After burn-in). Anything I say in the review is completely honest with my findings and no one paid or influenced me to say anything good or bad about this product.

X-FACTOR

The X-FACTOR of KE4 is the neutral nature of the sound. Audiophile community is divided into two parts as of my understanding. A part of the community chases the truest nature of the sound and another part of the community chases fun. And I envy the later ones. But if you ask me for my own/personal preferences I always chase neutral/natural sound signatures. And KE4 provides that with decent coloration in the low-end. And this is what separates it from the rest of the IEMs at this price range.

If I must describe the Sound of the KE4 by just a word it would be “Neutral”.

OBJECTIVE SOUND QUALITY

BASS

The bass of KE4 is elevated quite a bit for a neutrally tuned IEM. The bass is not enough for someone who likes bass since the midbass is not that prominent, but it does provide the midrange with a neutral tune.

Sub-bass: The subbass of KE4 is quite authoritative. It has the quality of feeling atmosphere is the rumble. Feels physical and deep at the same time. But there is a feeling in complex songs where the sub-bass does portray a laid-back approach in the mix, but rarely does it. KE4 doesn’t unnecessarily extract/amplify low-end of the songs, it projects them quite naturally and honestly. I would’ve liked a bit more texture from the low-end but it’s unfair to nit-pick because it costs just $199. Overall, it was a quite good experience for me in the Sub-bass section. I enjoyed digitally recorded music with them, and they did a good job of performing the tracks without losing the fun elements.

Music – Hollow (16-Bit Remix)

The bass lines in the song felt full of air and thump. The dual dynamic drivers seem to be working well. The middle part where the mid-bass presence overtook the sub-bass region felt a bit soft, but the sub-bass stayed authoritative throughout the song.

Mid-bass: Mid-bass is not as elevated as the sub-bass, but it still is on the fun side of things. Although the sub-bass to mid-bass transition is quite good for doing justice with the lower-mids, but as an Indian I wanted a bit more mid-bass than the sub-bass if we talk about my personal library. But most of the genres sounded just fine. This is what I think is the weakest section of KE4. The details felt a bit rounded off and the texturing also kept me craving for a bit. Let’s take a few examples to understand the mid-bass of KE4. In Hip-Hop tracks KE4 just felt very natural, as well as the Pop and rock. But in Electronic music, after delivering a wonderful sub-bass authority KE4 falls a bit short in the mid-bass. Contrary to that, the mids get a very natural feeling and don’t encounter any bloat or bleed.

Music – We All Have Dreams

When the bass-drops, where you would expect a bit of authority it feels very Neutral, and it doesn’t pair up with the sub-bass that it has. The vocalist feels extremely well done as the sub-bass.

Is KE4’s Bass Pillowy?

No, it’s not. Let me take 2 IEMs that sounded way Pillowy to me 1. Dunu DaVinci and another one is 2. ThieAudio Hype 4. Compared to them, KE4 is nowhere pillowy and has that authority and thump to call it a better than average Bass Experience in my opinion.

MIDRANGE

The mid-range on KE4 is beautiful and took the safest approach in the sense of providing a good balance. To dig deeper let’s jump in the lower mids.

Lower-mids: The lower-mids of KE4 hint a very natural yet full sounding experience. The male voices do sound natural and not overly elevated or toned down. The timbre of the instruments is very good for the price. (One of the best Timbre I heard under $500). The texturing of the instruments, including vocals, are apt. No artifacts or imperfections I get to notice in this region. I fairly enjoyed the lower mids on this IEM. Although if I must nitpick one thing, it would be the transience nature. The dynamics are excellent but KE4 is not coming out as a fast IEM till this range.

Music: Time Alone with You

In this song, Daniel and Jacob Both sounded very full and textured along with instruments. This track has a special feature where it can reveal any bleed or bloat in the sound, and I am happy to say KE4 passed it with flying colors.

Upper-mids: The upper-mids on KE4 is PHENOMENAL. There is not even a single fault that I can notice in the upper mids. If I have to say something, I have to say that I like elevation in this range a bit more but if I am judging from an average listeners perspective, the treble on KE4 is beautiful. It feels safe where it needs to be, it feels airy where it needs to. The overall projection of neutrality is simply excellent here.

Music: The Raven

Rebecca’s voice sounded airy and extended with getting harsh even a bit. The tonality is very lifelike and neutral. Texturing and details are apt for the price. KE4 never disappointed in the upper mids, even once in my listening sessions.

Treble

The treble on KE4 is well implemented as well. The first thing that you will notice is the amplitude is very well controlled in the spectrum. It never felt fatiguing nor even a hint dark. In some songs it might come as a bit of a bright tone, but it’s just there to prevent sound from getting boring. The airiness is ample in the songs. The transient nature is present. Relatively faster speed can be observed here.

All in all, I was quite impressed by the treble as well. With all the intricacies and details, KE4 does provide a middle way to enjoy every type of music.

Music: The Way Up

The cymbals came out detailed, the speed is more than enough for this track. I could’ve used a better attack though; I am not going to lie. But except that there is not many flaws and this comes from a $199 set which is unthinkable to me.

Subjective Sound Quality

Now coming to the subjective side of things this IEM does show its price tag. Well, you can’t have everything at $199 I guess, so they decided to cut corner in a few of the technical/subjective aspects of the sound which I am OK with since I don’t care about them that much to be honest.

Soundstage: Fairly spacious sounding and it can recreate atmosphere well. The bubble is spherical and sometimes it might feel like a single capsule, but I would call it a good sound staging IEM for the price.

Imaging: Imaging is OK. I have seen better imaging at this price. It has that typical stereo stretch more than a holographic/pinpoint precision in music. But in gaming it changes a lot, and I will discuss that at the later stages of the article.

Resolution: The details and resolution of KE4 is just average for the price. It resolves better than Letshouer S12 2024, but it does sometimes remind you of its price tag.

Dynamic Range: KE4 has a very dynamic sound. The fluidity and speed respect each other very well in this IEM.

Timbre: Drums do sound authentic, the low-end seemed a bit blunted but all the other parts are well executed. The violin sounded extremely good. Steel String Guitar sounded OK, but I would’ve liked a bit more crunch and transience to make it sound like real life. Piano sounded very good, it has that earthy weighted tonality, although I would’ve liked a bit more upper-treble elevation. The Saxophone sounded alright, although it is very lifelike and natural.

KE4 IS THE BEST GAMING IEM I TRIED UNDER $500

KE4 had a unique quality, and I almost missed that but fortunately I played “Disco Elysium” before posting the review and I had to include this section.

What do we need in a gaming IEM?

  • Lifelike Representation – KE4 is sounded so natural that few things like, glass and wood sounds made me uncomfortable. It sounded lifelike, like I was listening to 8K equivalent to Audio. “Uncharted 4” sounded like I was
  • Spacious Representation – KE4 sounded so open in games that it was scary in few games like “Outlast”. Spatial cues are very realistic.
  • Neutral Upper Registers – The upper registers are so beautifully tuned that gunshots and firearms never sounded peaky. KE4 is very safe in that case.
  • Excellent Midrange – Games like “Batman – Telltale Series” & “Wolf Among Us” so authentic and pulled me in the game unlike any other IEM.

Comparison

AFUL PERFORMER 5

These two IEMs especially found a good balance between being affordable and being mature in their tonality at the same time. But they do differ a lot even then.

Performer 7 is a braver approach to the sound. By the word brave, I mean it’s a riskier and bolder take on the tonality. Yet, P7 somehow smoothes out the harshness in the music whereas KE4 will give you the truest form of that representation. The upper half on KE4 reminds me of HD600 with a half-worn pad. Where P7 seems like a worthy upgrade to the P5.

The bass is more textured on the P7 with better body. But the physicality of KE4 is a touch better as well as it is more rounded. Resolution is better in P7, but tonality is better in KE4.

Mids are a bit forward on the P7, especially the lower mids. With a bit more texturing and details. But KE4 presents the mids in a very open fashion. The overall range feels like it is open and not on the face like P7 with a good amount of sense of space around the spherical stage and seems more holographic too. It creates such an odd position that half of my library sounds good on P7 (Vocal Centric) and others on KE4 (Instrument Centric).

In the treble KE4 is a total beast. It doesn’t have the same resolution as the P7 but the way it handles treble is extraordinary. It’s like neutral but given extra flavours here and there so that it doesn’t seem boring, even with my HRTF this thing just takes the cake for natural sound. P7 is a safer approach where the treble is smooth and reminiscent of AFUL house sound & not to mention the 10khz dip in my HRTF which makes the sound even smoother.

Although both IEMs are exceptionally good for their price and punch way above their price tag, it’s up to you to choose your flavour. Do you want a natural sound or a bit coloured?

JM1-DF BASED IEMs Ranked According to me: (In terms of my personal preference)

(Top is better)

  • ThieAudio Monarch MKII
  • Hisenior Mega5EST
  • Kiwi Ears KE4
  • ThieAudio Hype 4
  • Dunu DaVinci

Conclusion

I wholeheartedly recommend Kiwi Ears KE4. Not only at its price point but it can confidently compete with highly expensive IEMs. But the only thing you need to consider is you love music because you can’t magically make your music sound good. If you are looking for Gaming IEM, please don’t look further and pull the trigger.

5 Likes

Are you trying to help fill the gap here as @SenyorC is posting less? If so, you might consider using a standard repeating music playlist, and even borrow some forum standards as SenyorC did, like Trentmoller’s Chameleon for sub-bass. We all are familiar with certain tracks. I think the familiar references help a lot. SenyorC posted his list with links.

2 Likes


By the way, this is the worst IEM I tried in 2024. For reference, I like BASS, don’t get me wrong—I am not one of those reviewers who only review based on their preference. Hence, I attached the Singularity with it, which I like. But Deuce is uncomfortable. Not only is the fundamental tuning wrong, but the whole presentation is very, very average at best.

Too disappointed.

1 Like

Hey guys, just hosted a 2024 Audiophile Rewind on my YouTube Channel
here’s the link