Hifiman Ananda Open-Back Planar Magnetic Headphones - Official Thread

Well… Ananda vs LCD-GX did a quick back to back via Phonitor XE front/back output switching, Bifrost2, and Qobuz for the audio source. I think I prefer the lows/mids of the LCD-GX along with staging and depth. Both are close in detail but I think the Ananda just has better detail retrieval. It has a wider sounding stage with airy highs. While the GX has a deeper stage and I had an easier time placing sounds on that stage vs the Ananda, which to me had a very shallow stage but wider, but the placement was a little off to me, felt like I was searching at times while listening.

Overall both are pretty dang close though… I think if you prefer airy/shimmer highs and not as much warmth in the lows the Ananda would be the choice. If you prefer smoother overall quality and a little more warmth then the GX would be the choice.

Fit wise … I think the Ananda is more comfortable…lighter and almost no clamp force. But the cups are massive and travel down to my neck which is off-putting. The GX is more traditional slightly heavier and more clamp force. Now the GX is very comfortable and I can wear it for hours, but in comparison to the Ananda, it isn’t as put it on and forget it’s there. Both are quite comfortable but Ananda wins it even with the odd cup size shape.

Also, the GX has a more “present” sound, intimate even. Engaging is another one that comes to mind, but, it isn’t an overly fatiguing engage, more of a warm hug of and engagement. Ananda is engaging as well but I wouldn’t say intimate, more of the lean forward and listen engage, also can get fatiguing with the presentation for me.

This is tough… I like both a lot actually… but if I had to pick one… I think I would have to go with the smoother GX. It also seems as if tonal wise the GX edges the Ananda out. But it is slight and might have more to do with the smoothness* of its presentation.

Another caveat, is the GX isn’t a bass heavy headphone by any means, but in comparison to the Ananda it has a bit more “slam” emphasis, not by much though. I also personally like the presentation of vocals on the GX over the Ananda. But, I prefer how instruments sound with the Ananda. This of course is all personal preference. If I didn’t have my HD800(SDR) I would probably grab the Ananda…but, as it is, I think I need to try more of these “fabled” other HiFiMan cans that some of you praise so much :wink:

At the end of the day, both are actually more similar than different with only mild-medium differences in capabilities and sound profiles. These are both excellent headphones, and at their current price points I can easily recommend either of them, just need to know what your preference and use case for them are to narrow which is best for yourself…also I recommend if given the chance to listen to both for yourself, to form your own opinion.

*Smoothness: to me means there are no glaring issues to my ears such as sibilance, or treble spikes, bass bleed, etc … essentially something that doesn’t offend too much. It does not relate to FR graphs… I don’t overly care so much about them, mostly go off my ears… which are mine not yours :wink: so take as it is =)

edit: this is turning into a bigger thing than I intended when I started writing this post :sweat_smile:

8 Likes

Nice write up.

Of the two, which do you think has a more natural sounding timbre? I know you prefer the vocals of the GX, but I was wondering about timbre specifically.

The build issues with hifiman are too great for me to overlook, but I’d still like to give them a listen.

Thanks Tyler. :+1:t4:

1 Like

I find the timbre on the Ananda a tad harsh, drums especially can be very noticeable when switching from different drums/cymbals in the set. Where the GX seems to not have such abrupt separation. Both are brighter planars, but I think the Ananda can be too sharp with its timbre at times, if that makes sense.

Also keep in mind I’m using strong words to help define this, so take it as mild exaggeration to better get my point across.

So, I think that of the two the GX has a more natural easier listening timbre with both instruments and vocals.

3 Likes

Right on, thanks.

It seams like timbre is the hardest thing for planars. They do so many things so well, but timbre is what’s lacking. Granted I haven’t heard many planars.

I can see why BioDyna’s like ZMF are so popular (not just timbre, of course).

Thanks for the quick response!

1 Like

Yeah I tend to agree with the timbre comments. I find the Ananda more ‘planar-like’, while the GX is less noticeably like that. This might be due to the differences in tonality, but that’s been a trend for Audeze planars in general I find. They have a less… analytic timbre.

4 Likes

Sound like the Edition X.
Thanks for your awesome review!

I would like to hear your thoughts on the Arya.
I been a HiFiMan fan for a long time. I been blessed that I have not run in to quality issues.

3 Likes

I would love to hear the Arya as well :wink: I am not a big HifiMan fan…but, I have limited experience with long term listens with their stuff outside of the 4XX and now these Anandas…I’m more of a Dynamics guy =) Hence my love of ZMF

2 Likes

Got it, That makes sense now.

Thanks.

2 Likes

Another excellent review, thanks man. I was curious about how the Ananda compares to the GX and this really helped.

3 Likes

Great job Tyler. Nice comparison.

2 Likes

Great comparison brother! What amp did you prefer the Ananda’s on most of your incredible amp stable? Did you feel that either headphones had a greater synergy with one of your amps over another?

4 Likes

I would say my favorite was the Phonitor XE.

But the Schiit Hel is really good as well with both. But prefer the GX synergy with it… this could be due to the visual aesthetics synergy lol…

Of the DAPs I played with so far I actually really liked the A&K Kann Cube with the Ananda, even though ESS DAC chips aren’t my favorite.

The Cayin N6ii was great with both, smoothed the Ananda out a tiny bit, while accentuating what the strengths of the GX are.

Just wanted to reiterate that these two headphones are actually fairly similar in performance with only mild to medium difference in sound profile, one is brighter more analytical (Ananda). The other is smoother and more intimate/engaging (LCD-GX).

Also this is my opinion/experience on the two headphones. Everyone has biases, based on experiences, expectations, mood, environment etc… the fun thing about headphones is, it is an objectively measurable and subjectively enjoyable hobby. No one is wrong for liking what they like in this hobby.

To each thine own ears be true! Cheers lol

5 Likes

Very cool! Yeah I think it sounds really engaging with my solid state THX but for longer more enjoyment listening I think it pairs really good with MCTH and LYR3 Tube Hybrids, smooths things out just a touch more.

Out of curiosity which ZMF headphone from a soundstage stand point do you think it most compares to? Obviously timbre is very different, wondered about the size and depth of the stage compared to other ZMF cans!!

3 Likes

I check it out vs the Aeolus/VC/VO…hopefully they don’t turn into long ramblings like the GX post lol

3 Likes

I love your posts! Thanks buddy!

2 Likes

VO vs the Ananda isn’t really fair… but I’ll just say I think the VO is better with a warmer profile. I think tonal balance is also favored along with timbre with the VO. I do think I’m hearing more details with the Ananda, but I think that has more to do with the brightness factor and the way it does timbre. Overall the VO is a more enjoyable listen…which was to be expected. Verite open was using the universal perf lamb skin pads.

Aeolus vs Ananda is “closer” in at least price bracket(ish), but not really with the current Ananda price being around $700. Aeolus using universal suede perf pads.
Hot damn… I forget how good the Aeolus sounds!!! F me standing…notes just hang ethereal, especially with acoustic tracks…it just sounds right, with exceptional detail…erghh…sorry got sidetracked…back to comparison…

Ananda has more “air/shimmer” but feels like I’m further away from the music. Aeolus is warmer smoother and is more tonally satisfying for me. Though the “pluck” factor of the Ananda is really nice! but notes decay too fast in comparison to the Aeolus…which depending on the music, your preference etc could be a good or bad thing.

Overall I think at $700 the Ananda is a phenomenal headphone and very enjoyable! Would I take it over my ZMFs … well…no… but honestly I don’t think they are competitors they are capturing different aspects of the music in my opinion. They make good companions more than they do competitors.

9 Likes

Interesting.

Do you plan on purchasing a pair of Ananda?

1 Like

No, my LCD-GX is too close in performance, plus if I want that airy/shimmer, I can always throw on my HD800(SDR) :wink: But, if one didn’t have any of the aforementioned headphones the Ananda at it’s current price is a great deal…just make sure to budget for a better cable :wink:

3 Likes

What about stage though!!! Hahaha what does the Ananda compare to most closely from ZMF purely on sound stage :slight_smile: so I know it’s more open sounding then the Aeolus for sure, how much of a stage difference I guess is there between your other ZMF’s :wink: that’s what I am trying to figure out, as I enjoy the stage on the Ananda but would like to know what is closest to from ZMF so I know what to listen to next from them.

3 Likes

Hmm… I will give another listen after my evening walk with the fam… but I’m a couple Kentucky Mules deep and have another one waiting at home lol

4 Likes