This is the place to discuss all things to do with the Symphonium Meteor:
While I loved the sound of the higher end Symphonium Helios, I couldnât get past the large and somewhat awkward shell design. Others who didnât have any trouble with the shell got the benefit of what I would describe as a somewhat U-shaped, punchy, and highly engaging sound, with fantastic imaging, but sadly the shell size was a dealbreaker for me.
It seems Symphonium has taken that feedback and introduced a much smaller and more comfortable in-ear headphone (IEM) called the Meteor. The slogan on the box says âSmall Size. Massive Soundâ, and I have to say this is how Iâd describe it as well. The Meteor also comes in at a more accessible price tag of $599, compared to the $1100 Helios.
GRAS RA0402 Measurements:
Okay so this is one to pay attention to. But to describe the sound a bit more, itâs kind of like the laid back sound of the SA6 Ultra, but with a more normal contour to the ear gain. What does that mean? Basically the presentation for instrument and vocal tones is slightly less mid-forward than the SA6, trading off some of the richness for extra clarity - but still laid back.
Hereâs the smoothed version of these two graphs for readability and comparisonâs sake.
The other key difference is that the Meteor is a bit more U-shaped, with more bass and more upper treble âairâ to it. I think some may find this level of air to be a bit zingy or fatiguing, but this is also where tip rolling achieved a nice middle ground for me.
I also wouldnât call the Meteor neutral, even though the ear gain up to 3khz is what I would describe as fairly normal. Thereâs still some playful coloration here, being a bit relaxed throughout certain sections of the lower treble - certainly in contrast to the upper treble, but itâs all done quite well. It also has a bass boost thatâs distinct and very punchy sounding, so for those looking for âslamâ, this has it.
Overall, while the SA6 and SA6 Ultra (if they do another run) should still be on everyoneâs radar at this price point - theyâve been my favorites up until this point - the Meteor makes a strong case for itself as a leading alternative.
Conclusion⌠for now.I think Iâll put it this way for now: If you want a kind of rich and present midrange thatâs smooth and mellow, go with the SA6 and SA6 Ultra. If you want a more punchy, U-shaped style of sound, Iâd recommend the Meteor. And I also have to give a nod to the Moondrop Variations for those who want stronger ear gain and upper mids overall - it has to be recognized for its excellent performance and detail as well, even though I personally find that one to be a bit shouty. Lastly, the Thieaudio Oracle MKI is still closest to what Iâd consider neutral out of all of these, but there are now so many excellent options around this price point that itâs just different flavors of excellent.
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://headphones.com/blogs/reviews/symphonium-meteor-measurements-and-impressions
Could you throw some comparison between these and Softears RSV?
Meteor is more âV-shapedâ, more detailed and punchy, slightly more relaxed mid treble. Personally I like the Meteor better.
I have not tried any Softears stuff yetâŚneed to.
Does anyone happen to have the nozzle dimensions? Thanks
I can ask the Symphonium team and get back to you.