I’ve had my HM1 powered up, and running, for a bit more than a full day now. Being class A, it should be drawing the same amount of power regardless of whether it is doing anything or not (or, at least, variances are not from the amplification stages).
Temperature
Peak surface temperature of the unit is 105℉, with the front panel being at 99℉, as measured in a room that’s at 72℉. Total heat output is about 40W at idle (it’ll be a bit lower driving headphones, as some of that energy will be dissipated in the transducer rather than just output as heat). So putting your hand on the unit, you can feel that it’s warm, but hold it an inch away and you can’t tell at all.
Class A vs. Class A & Servo
Most of yesterday’s (and last night’s) listening was done in “Class A” mode. Today I’ve been in “Class A & Servo” (the “servo” refers to a negative-feedback implementation) mode. Transparency and resolution both increase audibly in this mode, which is hard to imagine given how it sounds in plain “Class A” mode.
The HM1 does not become dry, sterile nor clinical in servo mode. The “weight” of its delivery isn’t changed (still gobs of impact, punch and slam). Nor is causing even a hint of listening fatigue; and I’ve been listening for about seven straight hours in servo mode.
The trade-off is a hair less “meat on the bones” vs. simple “Class A” mode. I do mean a hair. The increase in transparency/resolution is much more apparent than the very small and subtle shift in perceived density.
You can tell the difference simply by switching between modes, though the switch isn’t instant. When you turn the mode nob, relays switch out the amplifier stage, the Zähl logo goes out, a second later the logo comes back on, the relays switch back, and sound is restored (at the same output level; there’s no apparent level shift between modes).
Sound Adjustment
When enabled, these apply subtle lift/cut to the bass and treble regions. The steps are audibly different, but seem to affect their respective sonic regions in a more “complete” and “pleasing” manner than similar controls on other amplifiers. The range of adjustment is quite small; even on their maximum lift/cut settings, they’re not fundamentally changing the character of the amplifier. I could happily listen with the bass lift at full, where as with something like the Pro iCAN … anything past the first step is too much and has negative impacts elsewhere.
In “servo” mode, I found that simply engaging one step of bass lift, and one step of treble cut was enough to restore any lost “meat” vs. simple “class A” mode.
Power/Drive
This thing just seems to shrug off whatever load you present it with.
I borrowed a friend’s set of Susvara (recent build) to play with here. The HM1 drives them easily, with more than 30 dB of headroom vs. my normal ~84 dB/SPL listening level.
I think this is the best I’ve heard the Susvara … and over a couple of years I’ve tried them with all of the “high-end” recommendations (including speakers amps well to the high-side of $500K). The HM1, despite being entirely neutral, was somehow even able to lessen the sensation of “limpness” in terms of bass and slam that I find with all of HiFi Man’s cans (excepting the HE6 and HE-500 variants).
If the HM1 could also make the Susvara look and feel less like they were cobbled together in a shed, using the cheapest materials possible, I might have finally had to have sucked it up and bought a pair. Alas, the HM1 is merely an amplifier. A superlative amplifier, to be sure. But an amplifier nonetheless. Whereas the level of transformation I’d want on the build of the Susvara would require a magician or wizard …
…
Proper sound impressions will start to follow from here …