Munich High End 2025 Impressions

Munich High End 2025 just wrapped up and I was fortunate enough to be able to go. For anyone unaware, Munich High End is one of the largest audio shows in the world, and this year actually happens to be the last year it’s in Munich, as the show will be moving to Vienna next year.

Keep in mind, show impressions… Heaping mountains of salt.

I was surprised to see how large the show is this year, especially the headphone section. I thought maybe this would be more low key, given all the craziness going on in the world, but it was still quite packed.

Fiio FT7 - this was one of the more impressive headphones of the event for me. Solid low end without sounding boomy, maybe a bit forward in the mids but not in a way that detracts from clarity. Good sense of separation, no weird compression issues. I heard a hint of extra treble zing to it, but nothing particularly unpleasant. It may be a bit different from what I heard at canjam NYC.

Audeze LCD S2 - it’s a bit honky in the mids. It did great with acoustic music but that kind of forward upper mid style tuning doesn’t work for electric guitars and vocals all that well. Kinda dark in the mid treble too, nothing too out of whack or anything, just softer treble. The bass was pretty good too I thought, I’m just not a fan of this upper mid tuning. Comfortable though - maybe a good candidate for EQ. I will also note, audeze had some other Atmos mix stuff at their booth that was super cool.

Audeze CRBN2 - I don’t know what’s going on with this, if it’s the energizer or what. But every time I hear this one it just doesn’t sound right, and it’s hard to really pinpoint why. It’s like… Every part of it sounds strange. The original CRBN was decent, not my favorite but I can see why people liked it. This new one… Unless there’s something I’m missing to do with the source (and estats are unique there), I can’t seem to find anything enjoyable. The bass sounds kind of loose, but also tubby, the mids sounded boxy, treble shouty… I don’t get it, but I’ll leave an open mind.

DCA Noire XO - This the best open back DCA I’ve heard. While it’s not my most preferred kind of sound signature, I still liked it quite a bit. It is fairly Harmanlike, however for anyone who didn’t like the treble of the Expanse, which is also Harmanlike, the XO’s is significantly better. There’s also a solid sense of bass depth to it, with a sub bass emphasis.

I was trying to think if there are other open-back headphones with this kind of distinct low bass presence around its asking price and it’s hard to come up with anything, other than maybe headphones like the Sierra. That’s because they use an electrical filter, something more open back headphones should do in my opinion. With that said, I did hear a bit of forwardness to the 2.5khz band, similar to what I found with the closed Noire X. It worked especially well with instrumental music, providing an extra sense of detail/clarity but takes a small hit with vocals. The thing is, the XO also seems to have quite a bit more upper treble presence to it as well, which may or may not be acceptable to people, but it also serves to kind of lessen or mask any potential problem areas lower down. All headphones need to contend with HpTF variability, and in my view this is a reasonable choice to make in the face of that problem.

Fostex Booth - I tried both of the high end ones, the flagships. The open back was quite rough in the treble and one I knew immediately wasn’t for me. The closed back I thought sounded a bit better there but weird in other areas. It was actually the t60rp mkIV that I liked the best. Though maybe just in comparison to the flagships. I would like to get that one in at some point and spend more time with it.

Aune Prototype (AR9000?) - Their upcoming open back flagship. I want to be clear this was deemed ‘pre-alpha’, and not ready. So the tuning will change. But this had some very impressive low end. The rest of the tuning was pretty good, maybe a bit of hardness in the mid treble between 4-6khz. But it’s bass and sub bass quality was really the standout feature. You don’t normally get this kind of bass in open back headphones, at least where this is achieved acoustically. From what I could tell there was no filter here like there is on the XO or Sierra.

ArcTec-Berlin Planar Prototype - This is a new high end planar from the mind of Klaus Heinz, the man originally behind the AMT driver concepts used in the HEDDphone. It was interesting to see him opting for a planar driver instead here. I asked why a planar and he said it’s primarily to do with the weight constraints of AMT. He told me this one had a pure silver diaphragm. They also had a full B&K 5128 there showing off how they measure, which was cool to see. Subjectively, it sounded really good! One of the better headphones at the show generally. Kind of similar to HE1000 though maybe a bit more balanced for the upper mids and low treble in particular.

Meze 105 Silva - Definitely the coolest looking headphone at the show. They said they were aiming for a balance between the AER and the 109 Pro, and I think they achieved exactly that. So personally I did not like the 105 AER, but I do enjoy the 109 Pro, it just has a bit of treble grittiness to it on occasion. The Silva sounded noticeably less trebly than the 109, but also a bit less detailed. So it’s a trade-off, but one I think people will like.

Austrian Audio Composer New Pads - I think this was my favorite headphone at the show. I don’t want to say the pads changed all that much about the sound, because they didn’t. It’s mostly just that the composer is already a really solid headphone and one that definitely deserves more appreciation. Like it’s very expensive, but the sound is genuinely great. For what they did change, they told me it’s about a 1-2dB downtilt across the spectrum, which makes perfect sense if you know how that headphone performs generally. I’ll try to get a unit in to measure, maybe it’s time for an updated review with these new pads. They also had a new pad ring mount structure to make the headphone fit better for people with large ears. I suspect this may also improve the in-situ consistency for people, but again I need to test this to confirm how it behaves.

Moondrop Para II - Sounded like a generally competent planar. If I recall, the original Para was good but a bit on the shoutier side of things, I didn’t really get that sense from the Para II. Also the bass was better than I expected. Like a tighter, deeper kind of bass than what I remembered. I’m not sure if that’s just due to the music I was listening to though because I played it off of their setup and not my own music.

Moondrop Horizon - The Moondrop guys told me this was meant to be kind of like a sequel to the Void, so a budget dynamic driver headphone. Now… the Void was released some time ago and wasn’t all that well received. I didn’t personally review it but I did have a unit in at one point, and yeah it wasn’t great. I expect the Horizon to do a lot better. Its shortcoming to my ear was definitely still to do with the treble, where something didn’t sound quite right, but everything else sounded pretty good, and better than a LOT of headphones I’ve been testing at home lately. So this might be one to watch for a good value option. I’m going to see if I can get one in.

Genelec Speakers - Definitely my favorite speaker room of the show. When you first sit down, there’s nothing immediate that jumps out at you. There’s no particular ‘wow’ effect going on with this, instead it’s just that things sound timbrally correct, especially to do with things like cymbal hits and percussive tones. We did go to a bunch of other speaker rooms but most of them were just hilariously bad/weird. I mentioned this to Cameron at the time, that when you go to all these different rooms and you get some sort of ‘wow’ effect, you think to yourself “okay that was cool”, and then you go to the Genelec room and the novelty of that previous experience wears off quick, because the Genelec stuff just sounds so much more right.

If I had the money, I would be buying some of these speakers. The thing is… the room itself was significantly more modest than the vast majority of the stuff at the show, and I have to say I thoroughly appreciated that. No ridiculous stacks, cable memes, or crazy designs. Just ideal function, making music sound great.

JBL Summit - I only went to this room because our good friend Dr. Sean Olive suggested it to me, and yeah it was a good suggestion. Again, most of the rooms with hundred thousand dollar setups that looked all kinds of wild sounded really rough. The JBL Summit setup by contrast was once again far more modest, and shocker… sounded really good. This was some of the best midrange I’ve heard on any speaker setup, but in a way it was slightly overshadowed by a bit of extra bass and treble. It wasn’t imbalanced sounding, just like a very slight flaring of a ‘consumer’ tilt. I can see why they did that, and I think it’s exactly the kind of thing most people are going to like.

Other stuff - My favorite section of the show was the OEM area, where I got to look at various drivers and other parts, giving me all kinds of unhinged ideas for my next DIY projects. I spoke to some folks who sent me home with a pair of coaxial-like headphone drivers, and if I can make it work… this would be like having an actual subwoofer in a headphone. Their demo of it was kind of like listening to a normal headphone while simultaneously getting a face massage.

The other thing that really stood out to me there was a company called GSS, and their sole focus is on making compact speaker designs. They had an extremely small setup with a compact rectangular subwoofer (it looked crazy still), and the amount of bass this thing could put out for its footprint was astonishing. It sounded better than most of the speaker setups at the show generally.

Anyway that’s it for now, if anyone else has impressions of the show by all means feel free to post them. We should have a wrap up video of the show coming out soon, but in the meantime, here’s some fun that we had while there.

9 Likes

@Resolve Thanks for your highlights.

I don’t quit understand the “downtilt” part. What do you mean by that?

Torben

I feel very much the same about the CRBN 2, as they sounded off in a way it was hard for me to pinpoint, and for the new Moondrop Para which sounded pretty good to me.

I also loved the Composer with the suede pads thanks to @Resolve suggestions (btw it was super super nice to meet you and Cameron, such a nice and down to earth people you guys are, and thanks again for all you do!) and I also liked the Zmf Caldera Closed a lot. I’m not usually a closed back guys but that one sounded great.

The Joal was maybe the biggest surprise, as I didn’t like the Diana MR very much, but the Joal sounded very convincing and “correct”. Biggest disappointment maybe the susvara, but I have some doubt about how well it was driven, as it sounded super bright and thin, way more than the he1000 unveiled.

All in all it was a great experience, mostly thanks to great people like Andrew, Cameron, Orazio (from Warwick), Zach and Bevin, Chris (Zahl) and many more!

Cheers from Italy!

1 Like

Well… we’ll see what it does when we measure them. But that kind of description would mean that the general balance would shift slightly towards bass and away from treble. But 1-2dB is very subtle.

I demoed the CRBN back to back versus the Audeze LCD family, Stax, and Warwick e-stats. Despite similar prices, the CRBN was not in the same league. Not even close. Zero interest from me.

Looking forward to your measurement :slight_smile:

Torben

Didn’t you get to try any IEMs?

1 Like

Yes, but nothing in particular stood out.

Bit of a controversial take here but… I tend not to try IEMs at shows these days just because most of them aren’t very good. There are exceptions but I just find myself less interested in using that time for IEM discovery vs headphone discovery. Thankfully the IEM crowd is a bit more measurements focused, so the good stuff has an easier time of getting onto my radar anyway.

2 Likes

Thanks Resolve for your post.
As someone from Munich I will miss the show quite a bit.

Always liked the weird speaker show:




:joy:

and the increase in attending headphone companies in recent years was a welcome change and lot of headphone celebrities to see and speak to. Special shout out to Bevin who kindly took great care with my Verite Closed which will go back to the workshop for a refinish.

As someone who has a pair of Genelec speakers at home I usually skip this show room as either the speakers shown there are too big or too small for me. :wink:
But your are right their “boringness” is quite exciting. :grin:

Headphone wise my surprise favourite headphone was the Erzetich Charybdis and the HEDDphone 2 GT sounded off in comparison to the NoireXO, which I liked also very much. Very much fun and engaging and the Charybdis added soundstage and technicalities to that. The Charybdis is heavy and looks awkward but was still very comfy at the show. Will try this definitely at home.

I saw you doing your Composer interview and as much as I would like the composer from an engineering point of view, the tuning is not to my liking.

4 Likes

This was my second Munich High End. Before I get into the impressions, a little disclaimer to my approach to the show this time.

Overall, I’m mostly interested in over-ear headphones, because this is what I can use at home for my enjoyment without disturbing the neighbors and family. I also use IEMs when working or at the office. So, while I enjoy speakers occasionally (and share the love to Genelec, as I recently had a great chance to audition various Genelec products at a showroom in Shanghai, including a Dolby Atmos setup made of various Genelecs), I didn’t spend time in the speaker zone this time. And although I think source gear matters, it’s really hard to spot a difference at a show, so I didn’t focus on that kind of devices this time.

Another consideration: I tried to listen to open back headphones in isolated booths or quieter areas, leaving it to close-backs in the noisier areas this time. Last time my listening experience of open-backs in buzzing open spaces was too far off, because there you cannot really hear fine details, and have to crank up the volume a lot, lifting the treble or bass to unbearable levels.

And final disclaimer: while during my first High End I was feeling like a kid in a candy shop and tried to listen to as many headphones as possible in 2 days, this time I focused more on those which I would consider buying at some point or the new stuff that got me curious. Hence, notes below are biased for sure.

Let’s go! And we start with…

A disappointment: stuff that was not there

The first prize goes to Focal, as they simply didn’t show up this time. To me it was a big disappointment because I planned to do a thorough audition of Azurys and Lensys, comparing them to my experiences with ZMF Bokeh, DCA Noire X and DCA E3. Didn’t happen.

The second prize goes to Sennheiser HE1. This time they decided not to bring it to the show. As an excuse, if you stayed in Munich, you could arrange an appointment at a local dealer.

The third prize goes to the Cambridge Audio’s Double Decker. Its presence made the previous show even fancier, so it felt like a missing bit this time.

An honorable mention goes to Grell who were there but… in the yard outside the building, so I only found them when I left the show at the last day. Seems like their idea of finding a quiet place worked out, but nobody found it. That’s a pity.

New kids on the block

Fiio FT7

Of all the fresh releases, this was my favorite. A very very decent open back planar headphone at €749.

It is better built than their cheaper models, but feels a bit plasticky and cranky when adjusting the headband. Plus it feels a bit wobbly on my relatively small head, so I can’t do real head banging in it. Also the cable they were using was too long and stiff, don’t know if that was a stock cable. But the complaints end here.

It’s lightweight for a big planar, the cups are fairly large to fit any ears. Most people won’t have any comfort issues with it.

Very good tonal balance, with good bass presence and extension. It’s not exactly Harman-like, but rather with more flat bass, slight forwardness in the mids, and some moderate spice up in the treble. Reminds me of the HE-6 tuning with less harshness in the treble. The timbre felt quite natural to me as well. I would probably reduce the treble by a couple dB with a high shelf EQ, but that’s basically it.

It feels very open and it is able to create an impression of a large sonic space around you, with clear instrument imaging and separation. It’s one of these headphones that are able to place vocals very intimately close to your ears while playing instruments at a respectable distance in the background.

Dynamics and punch are very good. Maybe not at the old Focals and HE-6 level, but still better than most of the modern planars.

Where it lacks is maybe in bringing up finer details in the recording. I tried to listen for it in a closed booth, but either the isolation was not enough, or it is not so good as some much more expensive headphones in this aspect.

Overall, I preferred its sound to most of the Hifimans, except for the Susvara and HE1000 Unvelied (but only the Unveiled version of the latter), and at this price point it’s an easy decision if I was shopping for an open back planar.

Auribus Acoustics Sierra x Lake People

I didn’t expect to find this handmade headphone at the show at all, and to my surprise there were several of them being the official demo units for the Lake People (&Violectric) amps.

Seems like these headphones are getting more and more traction, and this brand will be growing a lot in the coming years.

I was already very tired and very spoiled by the time I decided to listen to these. So all I could say about it is that it is a very very decent open back dynamic driver headphone with unusually strong bass extension and very decent tuning. If I try nitpicking, the imaging is not on par with its planar competitors. But otherwise it’s very comfortable and a very strong contender at its price point.

Aune AR9000

As Andrew mentioned above, this is still a prototype, so the tuning is not final. But I can already say that it looks and sounds pretty cool!

It uses an angled dynamic driver that it is put pretty far in front of your ears (not so far as in Grell’s OAE1, but further than in Focal Clear/Utopia) and a very open acoustic design.

You may expect it to sound crazy, but it actually sounds very normal in a good way. Pretty balanced tonally, with a strong bass that you don’t expect from a design so open. It has decent dynamics and punch. The mids sound about right. The treble sounded a bit metallic to me but not in an aggressive way. It had decent soundstaging with vocals standing out in the mix, but I wouldn’t say that layering and image precision were among its strengths.

Even though it was a prototype, the build quality was decent, and it felt pretty light. The fit was too loose on my head, but maybe they will make it more clampy or adjustable in the final version.


Will post more impressions when I get time in the coming days.

10 Likes

More (relatively) new stuff

Dan Clark Audio Noire X Closed (vs. E3)

I know it’s the Noire X Open that is the newest kid on this block, but I… didn’t even bother listening to it. Why? Because the DCA booth is in one of the loudest parts of the hall, and when it comes to Harman-like tuning, the devil is in the details. I may like or not like it, HRTF and AMTS would render my impressions irrelevant quite easily.

So, for me the most interesting question of this booth was: is the Noire X a worthy downgrade from E3 to consider?

In terms of weight and comfort, it actually makes sense to me. While I’m suffering from getting almost zero clamp force from E3 and getting all the weight push down on the top of my head and my jaws (this is actually happening as I’m typing this), Noire X is smaller, lighter, and more clampy. Ideal for people with smaller heads like me in terms of comfort.

“But how does it sound?” Overall similar to E3, but with noticeable enough differences.

Probably the more consistent difference is in the bass performance. Noire X feels more punchy, while E3 has much richer sub-bass presence and overall bass texture. In the FR words, Noire X has more emphasis on the mid-bass, while E3 does better at sub-bass and on bass clarity overall.

It’s worth to mention, that when it comes to DCAs, the bass performance depends on an amp. You needs something that has a bit more current than a dongle running from a phone to get it to good bass quantity and quality. Speaking from experience.

For the mids performance my skills don’t allow for any reasonable comparison. In the treble, however, the difference is noticeable. With an important caveat: your mileage will vary, as treble response differs a lot from head to head, and the AMTS technology makes things even more dramatic. For some people AMTS fixes things, for others breaks them. So, this is purely subjective/head-specific. On my head and to my ears, E3 has too much ear gain at 3.9 KHz and too much energy in the 8KHz region that makes it slightly shouty and sibilant at the same time. I didn’t hear the same artifacts on the Noire X, but it had way too much spice in the upper treble at around 10 KHz and above to my taste. Good news that just a high shelf EQ filter would solve it once and for all, so for me Noire X’s treble is easier to EQ than E3’s. But would I prefer it?

As for spaciousness and imaging, I heard the stage on Noire X noticeably smaller than on E3 and e.g. on ZMF Bokeh Closed. The imaging precision is still in the same league as E3, which the Bokeh isn’t.

So, would I consider downgrading from my E3 to get better comfort and just fix the FR with easy EQ? At this point probably not, because the price difference between a used E3 and a brand new Noire X is not so big. While I appreciate higher bass quality, finer detail, and larger stage. If I downgrade, I’ll choose something more utilitarian, because the glossy finish of the Noire X collects all the fingerprints, while it still feels like a headphone I don’t feel comfortable just throwing at my desk or into a backpack.

If I had no high performing close back and had around $1K to buy one, I would probably get a Noire X. It’s a pretty damn good headphone and it matches my preferences more than the Bokeh. I still need to figure out this about Focal Azurys though.

ArcTec|Berlin AB 92

Cryptic name, familiar face: there was neither ADAM nor HEDDphone booth at the show this time, but I ran into Herr Klaus Heinz at this random booth. I was very surprised to find one of the co-creators of the AMT driver to be working on a planar headphone.

This is still a prototype, called AB 92. It has a 1-micrometer thin diaphragm, dual-sided magnets, and supposedly a very solid aluminum chassis. They had to rush for the show though, so this one was partially 3D-printed instead. It felt pretty heavy still.

During a quick listening session I noticed that it provides a good sense of dynamics and punch. The timbre emphasizes pluckiness of the string instruments. The extra feeling of openness and airiness is for a big part correlated with excess energy in highs. Not to the level of some of the brighter Hifimans, but still out of my comfort zone. I expect the tuning and comfort to change though as it nears the production phase.

It’s going to be interesting to watch the progress of this new endeavor. I’ve asked Mr. Heinz about the next steps, and he shared that he would like to try engineering an AMT driver made of material as thin and as light. Fingers crossed, he will succeed and we’ll be able to try it out in the coming years.

Meze 105 SILVA

An update from House Meze: this one is positioned right in the middle between the cheaper and “funnier” 105 AER and the more expensive and the more refined 109 PRO.

All I can do is confirm: it sounds exactly like that. More balanced than the 105 AER but not as detailed as the 109 PRO. For consumers that’s really good news, because it seems to hit a sweet spot in terms of preferences and price.


To be continued with crazier High End stuff.

6 Likes

I know you were all asking for an hour long video of show impressions so luckily @GoldenSound and @Resolve have you covered!

9 Likes

^Great stuff. Thanks Resolve and Golden.

1 Like

The

1 Like

Great video guys. Lol repeatedly.

Last push to finish my impression dump…

Crazier High End stuff

Raal 1995 Immanis

Last time I heard this headphone in the open area and didn’t really understand what kind of a beast it is. This time I knew what it is and listened to it in quieter places. First with the Audma Maestro Hpa1 (TL;DR: the arrow indicators look super cool, that’s it’s main advantage :D). Then with the Feliks Audio Euforia - for a longer listen in an isolated booth.

Now I kind of understand why some people find it an incredible thing. Two things stood out to me. First one is a great sense of dynamics: this thing can blast air at high density and at a high speed, creating bursts of high sound pressure at your eardrum. Second and probably related one: some specific metallic sounds sound on it like nothing else. What impressed me the most is steel acoustic guitar. The sound is very intense, you can feel the texture, and the timbre emphasizes the metallic nature of its source. It feels like a steel string is plucked right next to your ear. Acoustic guitars and violins are a very fun experience.

For the rest of it, my and others’ earlier impressions are still valid: the tonal balance is very uneven, this is a very peaky boy with lots of resonances in highs, making it sharp-bright and not so convenient for most of the music I enjoy.

Yamaha YH-5000SE and YH-4000

These two look very similar and both deserve a design award. They are light (320 g), very comfortable, and look great. With a bit of HD800S vibe, but much more compact and elegant.

Unfortunately, for me personally, this is where the happy story ends.

YH-5000SE has a good sense of dynamic and punch, with typical focus on the mid-bass and a rolloff in the sub-bass. It clearly has a V-shaped tuning, with too much brightness in the highs. Its sibilant character gave me an impression similar to the Beyer’s 8 KHz peak. I have a suspicion that it is actually very similarly tuned to e.g. a DT880. For the asking price of $4.5-5.5K - no, thanks, I’d rather buy a 20 times cheaper Beyer, or a 10 times cheaper Beyer if I feel fancy.

Of the two YH-4000 units I tried, the first one was already broken. It sounded like it had a low-pass filter applied to it, everything above 1 KHz was pressed by good 20 dB or so. When I reported it to the staff at the booth the guy insisted that “this is how it is supposed to sound”. I didn’t buy into this and tried a second unit, which was totally normal.

The YH-4000 sounded to me like a slightly more normal version of the YH-5000SE. It had a bit more sub-bass, for the cost of heaving less bass clarity overall. It had still sharp and metallic but more tamed treble, again for the cost of less clarity and detail. It will probable have a more moderate price. But still too high to justify what you get for it.

Stax SR-X9000 x Feliks Audio Bliss

This is probably a dream combo for the fans of the classic e-stat sound. Great sense of detail. And great look & feel (mostly on the Bliss part, it’s a true piece of art and engineering).

However, I realized quite quickly during this show that most of e-stats are not my cup of tea. Too bright, too light in the bass, and too dry and weightless on the sustain and release of the tones.

Hifiman Shangri-La (Senior)

This was the first time I was listening to a Shangri-La Senior. I was listening to it right after the OG Susvara and the Susvara Unveiled. And I would pick either of the Susvaras rather than a Shangri-La any time of the day. I would probably even pick a HE-1000 Unvailed rather than a Shangri-La. Again, because of the e-stat sound character: it doesn’t really appeal to me that much.

Warwick Acoustics Aperio GoldenSound Edition

There are two e-stats that I find to be the Summit-FI though. One of them is the HE-1, and the other one is this.

I heard the Bravura and the Aperio before, but how @GoldenSound tuned this one is just worth a standing ovation. It has more bass presence and overall more enjoyable tuning to my liking. If you ever come across a Warwick booth at a show, try it, it’s fantastically well-balanced.

Ferrum Wandla GoldenSound Edition

Speaking of @GoldenSound’s creations, I briefly tested this stack just out of curiosity. And I was impressed with the DSP effects that were added there.

They do exactly what they claim to do: Impact+ adds a bit more bass and punch; Tube Mode adjusts the harmonics to give it slightly more “melodic” character; and Spatial Enrichment does increase the spaciousness effect ever so slightly, but much more distinctly than esoteric knobs on the Audma Hpa1. All of these effects are done in a very moderate and tasteful manner, so that they don’t ruin the character of the system but rather enhance them slightly.

If you don’t want to mess with EQ but want a good DAC with a few magic buttons on board, this is a great choice.

Hifiman Susvara Unveiled vs. Susvara OG

I listened to these two head to head for at least half an hour or maybe a whole hour. And I clearly prefer the OG Susvara. It has nothing to do with practicality even. OG’s treble does some magic things to my ears, Unveiled’s treble is more emphasized and lacks that magical synergy. That’s it, folks.

To close this post, I have to confess that I got Susvara-pilled this year. Last year I didn’t get enough time with it in a quiet enough environment. This year I went to Shanghai where I spent a few hours just listening to a lineup of Hifimans: Arya Unveiled, HE1000 Unveiled and Susvara OG. Susvara OG is that bitch that took my heart. I still find it too bright for casual listening, but its timbre gets so sweet, it’s character can get very punchy and intense, and it can do what others cannot do: disappear on my head and make me forget that I’m listening to a headphone, just dissolving in the music. Since then I listened to it on a bunch of different amps (ehem, all of them rather expensive), and I liked it on all of them. So, I know what I will be saving for in the years to come…


Thanks for bearing with my subjectiveness spoken out loud. There is just one last small bonus post pending: Questyle M15 vs. Zähl H1 :winking_face_with_tongue:

5 Likes