I’ll have more to say, especially around specifics, when I get around to writing up my all-up recent electrostatic experiences … but I’ll share some high-level thoughts as they stand.
For a start, driven off a suitably powerful and high-quality amplifier, the iFi Pro iESL sounds very good indeed. Certainly a more than worthy jumping-off point. And the iESL’s flexibility makes it a nice unit for exploring pretty much all of the available electrostatic headphones, new and old.
It does live-or-die based on how it is fed, and will let the character of the driving amplifier be heard quite readily.
I like it and will be keeping it in my setup.
At the same time, unfortunately, I cannot say it is in the same technical league as the two dedicated electrostatic amplifiers I now have, and have had some time to listen with. And that’s when being driven off an solid-sate amplifier that costs about the same as a BHSE and Carbon combined.
Which is not to say that some people won’t prefer the Pro iESL, but I’ll come back to that.
Those specific amplifiers can be an outwardly somewhat daunting prospect. For one, they’re not cheap, for another there are either lead-times or International shipping to deal with to get one, and they both put out a fair bit of heat.
While I can’t take the sting out of their respective price tags, other than by lauding their performance, my experiences in buying both were very pleasant and smoother/faster than I expected.
For the Headamp Blue Hawaii SE they quote 2-4 weeks lead time, possibly more, depending on color choice and whether you want the standard DACT-24 attenuator or the Alps RK50. I pinged Justin to ask what he thought my specific configuration (satin grey/RK50) would take; he said 2-3 weeks. From placing the order to my receiving the unit was exactly 2.5 weeks (17 days). Can’t argue with that!
For the Mjolnir Audio Carbon, from the time of order to delivery (from Iceland) was 10 days.
The performance of both of these amplifiers is clearly ahead of the Pro iESL. The most immediately noticeable differences are that they are more incisive, more detailed, exhibit faster transients and more control. The next thing that becomes apparent is that they both have more low-end impact, if not necessarily any additional low-end extension.
In contrast, the Pro iESL adds a little richness to the overall delivery at the cost of some resolution (both detail and to a lesser extent micro-dynamics) and impact. Some people may find that trade-off preferable to them, as the pairings are still competitively resolving vs. almost every other conventional headphone I can think of.
More details will be forthcoming (I’ve only had the Carbon since late Monday).
For me it raises questions as to where things like the KGSS/KGST or KGSSHV sit in relation both to the Carbon/BHSE and the iESL, as well as to how the Mjolnir-Audio builds might differ from the variety of other builders that sell those models. Additionally, it makes me wonder how the lower and mid-priced STAX amplifiers would perform in comparison.
Those questions will probably be ones I don’t actually explore myself, absent someone loaning me those other units.